Morally good justified or acceptable

by
6.71  ·  2,863 ratings  ·  958 reviews
morally good justified or acceptable

Justification Quotes (168 quotes)

File Name: morally good justified or acceptable.zip
Size: 77396 Kb
Published 05.11.2019

PHILOSOPHY - Ethics: Killing Animals for Food [HD]

The Definition of Morality

This is thought-provoking stuff, Vera. While your point is well taken, I think the problem lies not in justification per se , but rather false justification and rationalization. Surely nobody would deny your point that it's bad to make evil appear good. But what if the act in question really was good? Or what if we simply are not sure? This is presumably the paradigm case where justifications are relevant. If we are not sure whether an act was right or wrong, then it would be helpful to have some process which could help us gain this knowledge.

By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Cookie Policy , Privacy Policy , and our Terms of Service. Philosophy Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for those interested in the study of the fundamental nature of knowledge, reality, and existence. It only takes a minute to sign up. Most of them have to do with causing harm to other members of the community and violating their rights as they are defined within the community. For example murder is almost universally considered as an immoral act. However, there are situations for which murder is considered justifiable. A court will find someone innocent of murder if they can prove that they killed in self defense.

Leaders throughout the western world expressed similar sentiments. It is common for politicians to represent the perpetrators of violence as acting outside the boundaries of morality; their actions belong to an incomprehensible realm beyond our understanding of what is good and right. But the Charlie Hebdo killers were not acting at random — they were following a moral code.
how to remain happy in life

1. Descriptive definitions of “morality”

Anyone who cares about questions of war and peace — and who wishes to think deeply about how to assess those questions morally — should buy and promptly read Nigel Biggar's In Defense of War. Over the past few decades, many authors have written articles and books attempting to construct an apparatus for judging the morality of war. I know of none that approaches Biggar's book in lucidity and thoroughness. Readers who absorb and apply Biggar's criteria for assessing wars will have a clear and cogent way of judging whether past or future wars deserve to be considered just or unjust — by which Biggar means morally justified or unjustified. That's one reason why Biggar's book deserves a wide and responsive readership. Here is another: Precisely by doing his job so thoroughly and elegantly, Biggar inadvertently demonstrates more fully than any previous author that just war thinking, even at its very best, is an intellectual, moral, and theological fraud.

2 COMMENTS

  1. Amelio C. says:

    The topic of this entry is not—at least directly—moral theory ; rather, it is the definition of morality.

  2. Traninraka says:

    You re a badass book review what other books did jeff kinney write

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *